organizing your presentation

Give a summary of the situation, problem or concern and why it was
important to address this issue. Describe what you hoped to achieve and
the process you went through in addressing the situation, problem or
concern. Be sure to include the results, benefits to the agency and what
coursework was relevant to your success. Finally, describe how the
project benefited you personally and the lessons that you learned.

Who Will Make the

Presentation?

Plan what will be included in each part of the presentation and, if it is a
team project, who will do what. Involve as many team members as
possible in the presentation, if applicable.

Practice Practice will help you work out any problems in your presentation and

will help everyone to feel more comfortable. Know your material so
well that you can effectively and efficiently respond to any question.

Tend to the Details Don’t leave anything to chance. Develop a checklist to be sure you have

covered all the necessary bases. If using visual aids, arrange for
equipment through your site manager.

Revised June 2004

OCPM

Projects Handbook

EVALUATION

Who Will Evaluate
Your Projects?


1. Project Advisors

2. Cohort Peers

3. Invited guests

Advisor

Your advisor provides feedback on your presentation and a grade on your
written report. The evaluation forms, found in the Appendix, are:

• Composition and Format Checklist: If any question is answered

“No,” the project report will be returned for revision.

• Content Requirements of Written Report: If any sections are

missing, the project report will be returned for revision.

Peers and Guests

Your peers and guests provide feedback based upon your presentation and
your executive summary. The evaluation form, found in the Appendix, is:

• Project Presentation-Feedback Form


Please familiarize yourself with this form so that you will be prepared to
provide constructive feedback to your peers at the time of their
presentations.

Project #2 Additional
Evaluation

In addition to the above evaluations, Project #2 requires that you complete
a peer evaluation on yourself and each of your team members. The
purpose is to evaluate the impact of member contributions to the overall
success of the team. The evaluation form found in the Appendix is:

• OCPM Project #2 Team Member Evaluation.

Grading

Project advisors are drawn from a variety of professionals with
appropriate expertise in the public sector. They complete the approval,
feedback, and evaluation forms and checklists in the handbook appendix
to determine if a project meets content, composition, and format
standards.

Advisors employ a numerical system, where “5” is the highest and “1” is
the lowest possible score awarded within each of the nine content areas
listed on page 12 and on the evaluation form in the Appendix. Projects
with a cumulative score below 36 must be returned for revision; however,
advisors have the prerogative to request higher standards. Any project
with a rating of “3” in any of the nine content areas, regardless of the total
score, must also be returned for revision. For any rating of 3 or below the
project advisor must provide written comments to support their grade.

Revised June 2004

OCPM

Projects Handbook

APPEAL PROCESS

Appeal Process

 



Prev Home Next

index.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch1.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch2.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch3.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch4.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch5.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch6.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch7.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch8.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch9.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch10.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch11.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch12.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch13.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch14.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch15.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch16.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch17.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch18.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch19.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch20.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch21.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch22.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch23.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch24.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch25.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch26.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch27.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch28.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch29.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch30.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch31.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch32.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch33.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch34.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch35.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch36.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch37.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch38.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch39.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch40.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch41.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch42.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch43.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch44.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch45.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch46.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch47.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch48.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch49.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch50.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch51.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch52.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch53.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch54.htm  -   projectmanagementresearch55.htm    

Home | Join Now | Courses | Providers | Locations | Certification | Publications | Articles | Exam | International Committees
Disclaimer | Contact Us | About AAPM | Handbook | Sample Certificates | Member Benefits | Logos | Logos | Global Recognition | Study Materials | CPE | CPE | MPM | CIPM | Tools | Conferences | Ethics